|
Welcome
to the November 2003 issue of First Friday.
This report is about the strategic planning process underway at the
ASU-Jonesboro campus. This planning effort
is to update the directions for the university that were developed in 1991
and 1996, and is an attempt to chart the course for the institution for the
foreseeable future. Dr. David Cox,
professor of Education, is leading the planning process with assistance from
Dr. David McFarland, a consultant with Penson Associates, Inc. Information about the planning process is
archived in previous First Friday reports, and may be accessed through the link on this page. The
current strategic planning process has been joined by scores of participants
representing the faculty, staff, and students of the university, and many
representatives from constituencies external to the campus. Participants are organized into a planning
council, task forces to address topical issues, and subcommittees. These groups have begun their meeting
schedules, and each reports that discussions have
been open, candid, and thought-provoking.
Several important data gathering activities have supported the
planning effort. Stakeholders
Conference A significant meeting of many of
the planning participants occurred #
An overview of the planning process, the organizational structure for
the process, timelines for various activities, and how the plan will be put
into action. #
A set of observations about the university given by representatives of
the external community, and especially their perceptions of driving forces
which would influence the future of ASU.
The representatives responded to questions posed by participants. #
A set of observations from Dr. John Moore (a second Penson consultant)
about driving forces which have influenced other universities and which also
may be pertinent to ASU. #
A list of driving forces identified by stakeholders as those which
present internal and external opportunities, threats, or concerns. Participants at the Stakeholders
Conference met in small groups to identify internal and external driving
forces they felt would affect the future of ASU; which of these forces would
have the greatest impact, positively or negatively; and what should ASU do to
take advantage of, or minimize the disadvantages of these driving
forces. Some 25 forces were
identified. Each participant was asked
to identify the top five forces felt to be most important. The cumulative tabulation of the responses
is listed on page 6 of the summary of the meeting, linked as an attachment. Those issues that rose to the
highest frequency of identification, out of 458 indications, were: #
University image (59) #
Finding new resources (51) #
Absence of a sense of cooperation and community (46) #
Communications - community (43) #
Internal pride (42) #
Who we are and who we serve (34) #
Appropriate balance between teaching, service, and scholarship (31) Several observations may be made
on the basis of these results. First,
most of these issues are about ourselves, rather than those things outside
the university, and are more focused on the institution as it is seen
internally, rather than directed externally.
Second, these are things we can do something about, and more to the
point, no one else can address these things for us. Third, the issues depicted above are
perceived to have greater importance to the university than those issues
which were further down the list, but it is often the lesser things that we
talk about most often. We might want
to change our focus as we develop our planning activities to look at these Abig idea@ issues. Finally, several of the top-rated issues on
this survey also were identified as important in the 1996 planning effort. Granted, a lot has changed, but some
important things apparently have not changed.
Perhaps our plan this time may help us identify how we intend
to produce better image, community, and pride in Electronic Strategic Planning
Survey During the period from 40 alumni, 19 administrators, 13
community members, 5 students, and 4 Emeritus faculty members, completed an
electronic survey. Respondents were asked to answer
questions about 1.
What 2 or 3 core values would you like to be associated with ASU? (224 respondents) $ Quality education/quality teaching/student-centered
learning (131 responses, the greatest number throughout the survey) $ Fairness, honesty, and respect
(39) $ Service to local, state, or
national organizations, or all (39) $ Quality research (21) $ Multiculturalism/diversity (18) $ Academic integrity (18) $ Strong academic reputation/high
standards (15) $ Quality at a reasonable
price/affordable/accessible (15) $ Family atmosphere/feeling of
community (12) 2. What are 2 or 3 distinctive strengths or
attributes for which ASU is known and respected? (223 respondents) $ Specific academic programs, such
as Communications (30), Education (23), Nursing and Health Professions (23),
and Fine Arts (15) $ Faculty (48) $ Service and community
relationships (48) $ Commitment to students (42) $ Location (37) $ Nothing is distinctive (26) $ Size (23) $ Affordability (19) $ Teaching (17) $ Undergraduate education (14) $ Vision (11) $ Friendliness (11) $ Students and alumni (10) $ Athletics (10) 3. What are 2 or 3 strategic planning
directions in which you think ASU should be moving over the next five to six
years? (215 respondents) $ Enhance/increase research support
(24) $ Focus on undergraduate/select
Masters/Specialist programs (13) $ Technology in teaching/learning
(12) $ Increase salary and perquisites
(12) $ Tougher standards/selective
admissions (11) $ Enhance recruitment to students
from the state and nation (11) $ Involve students in direction
setting/be student focused/care for students (10) $ Find our unique role/niche in our
region (10) 4. What is the single most important thing that
needs to be done for ASU to rise to the next level in terms of reputation and
stature? (224 respondents. Items with seven or more responses are
listed as there were many single items.) $ Focus on academic excellence (11) $ Increase state funding/funding
equity (11) $ Continue to support and improve
development of athletic programs (10) $ Place academics above athletics
(8) $ Increase number of PhD programs
(7) $ Increase faculty salaries/equity
(7) $ Provide better incentives to
attract and retain high quality faculty (7) $ Promote improvement of faculty
scholarship (7) $ Improve communication from
administration (7) 5. As you envision ASU in the year 2009, for
what would you like it to be widely known and respected? (240 respondents. Items with seven or more responses listed.) $ Academic excellence (79) $ Highly-qualified graduates (44) $ Outstanding teaching (30) $ Outstanding research [in selected
areas] (21) $ Outstanding faculty (16) $ Student friendly (16) $ Affordable (14) $ Athletic
competitiveness/excellence (9) $ $ Well-rounded college experience
for students (9) $ Outstanding service (7) 6. Please list any other ideas or issues you
would like to share with the Strategic Planning Council. (240 respondents) $ Better communication with
administration (21) $ Mutual respect/trust needed (14) $ Take the strategic plan seriously
(14) $ Academics over athletics (11) $ Unhealthy adversarial relationship
between administration and faculty (7) The Stakeholders Conference gave evidence
that we need to address some important internal issues before we can hope to
address the aspirations of the electronic survey results. Our consultants, Dr. McFarland and Dr.
Moore, have advised that it is not unusual to have such a range of internal
concerns, especially in universities which have experienced recent and rapid
changes as ours has seen, but that we should take an opportunity now to bring
these concerns to be shared more deliberately than we were able to do in the
last Stakeholders Conference. In order to focus our collective
attention on these issues, an additional meeting of the Stakeholders has been
planned. The meeting will be held
Thursday, November 13, from What will be the issues we want to
address at the November 13 meeting? It
will be possible to combine the topics which emerged in the last Stakeholders
Conference into four general and significant topical areas: #
Sense of cooperation, communication, campus community, and internal
pride. #
Who we are and who we serve, including the balance between teaching,
scholarship, and service, i.e., clarification of our mission and a president=s perspective of our vision. #
Finding new resources. #
Enhancing the university image, both externally and internally. It may be important to recall why
this planning process is important.
Each of us wants a better university.
Each person at ASU wants to feel that his or her daily effort will be
valuable toward achieving that goal.
The strategic plan, thoroughly publicized, can make each of us aware
of the importance of our individual effort. Each of us is important to realize
that goal, and no one person alone can make it happen. We all need to work together to achieve the
goals of a better university. The
strategic plan can shape our collective efforts. This will be a plan from and for
all of us, and will be a guide for the present as well as for the future of
the institution. Our successors will
benefit from the thoughtful and thorough attention we give to this task, and
it is to them that we owe our best effort. I invite all within the university
and its constituents to join this effort to define our future. I believe that our future will be better
than we are today, but that all of us must make it so. I would be pleased to have your
thoughts on this material, or to respond to any other inquiry. I can be reached by email at president@astate.edu. Les Wyatt, President
First
Friday, September | First
Friday, October | ASU Home
Page | Strategic
Planning |