University
Communications
Office
Arkansas State University
Jonesboro,
Arkansas
Staff
Markham Howe
Sara McNeil
Gina Bowman
(870) 972-3056
fax (870) 972-3693
More information:
NewsPage Links to News Releases
& Announcements
Campus Calendar
Public activities at ASU
About
ASU
Overview, history
and more |
College of Humanities and Social
Sciences begins spring seminar series Feb. 9
Feb. 4,
2010 --
The College of Humanities and Social Sciences will be sponsoring a
seminar series with speakers and presentations from different
departments in the college. The seminars will be held on Tuesdays from
4-5 p.m. in Wilson 217C ( the Konold Room). The series will begin
Tuesday, Feb. 9, with Dr. Rollin Tusalem, assistant professor in the
Department of Political Science. The series runs through Tuesday, April
6.
For more information, contact Dr.
Veena Kulkarni, series coordinator, at (870) 972-3331, or e-mail her
at vkulkarni@astate.edu. A
complete program for the series is below.
Spring 2010 College of Humanities and Social
Sciences
Seminar Series
Tuesday, February 9, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Dr. Rollin Tusalem, Department of
Political Science
Title: The Politicization of the Military and Democratic
Consolidation
Abstract: Extant scholarship on democratic consolidation has not
explored the empirical relationship between states that have a
politicized military apparatus and its inability to strengthen and
deepen its democratic politics. As Diamond asserts, the key to any
consolidated democracy occurs when the, “military is subordinate to the
authority of elected civilian officials,” (Diamond 1999:11). Indeed, the
military in transitional states is considered to be one of the most
important agents that can determine the outcome of democratic politics,
but there is a systematic lack of empirical work to assess the
military’s effect on democracy’s consolidation. Established research has
shown the causal relationship between the role of institutions, civic
culture, colonialism, the political economy, and the type of transition
on the stability of democracies, but none has explored the role of the
military as an institution that can drastically affect democratic
outcomes (See for instance Bunce 2002). This led many scholars to notice
how the omission is striking since the military is the most
consequential actor in postauthoritarian transitions and the success or
failure of these processes to a large extent hinges on its political
behavior (Barany1997:1). Indeed, democratization research has been
state-centric, but it has led to a complete neglect of the military as a
central topic of empirical research. Thus, this empirical study takes on
this challenge by examining the role of the military in the
consolidation process more than 30 years after the third wave of
democratization. This paper also advances the notion that when the
military has institutionalized its role in politics as being
interventionist, that is, it has engaged in coups, counter-coups, and
coup plots in the recent past, the likelihood for democratic
consolidation becomes difficult.
Tuesday, February 23, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Dr. Gregory Hansen, Department of English and
Philosophy
Title: Pranks, Tall Tales, and Old-Time Fiddle Tunes
Abstract: Old-time fiddling consists of a wide variety of
traditional tunes passed along for more than 200 years in America.
Historically, the style has been recognized as an important form of
dance music used for a variety of styles including clogging, square
dancing, waltzing, and other social dances that were often held in
community centers or individuals' homes. These dance sessions are
known as "frolics," "free-for-alls," or "house parties," and researchers
have recognized the place of these events in creating and affirming
social connections within various communities. One little studied
aspect of these events is the popularity of playing practical jokes on
unsuspecting dancers. This presentation looks at this pranking
tradition by connecting it to a related cultural tradition also present
at these social events, namely, the telling of tall tales. An
examination of connections between dancing, playing practical jokes, and
storytelling yields a richer understanding of the complexity of the
fiddler's role within the little communities that supported the old-time
dance tradition.
Tuesday, March 2, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Dr. Kevin Shafer, Department of Criminology,
Sociology, and Geography
Title: Reconsidering Marital Exchange: A Comparison of First Marriage
and Remarriage Patterns in the United States
Abstract: Divorce and subsequent remarriage have become an
important part of American family life in recent decades. However, there
are significant gender differences in the likelihood and formation of
remarriage. In first marriage, both men's and women's socioeconomic
status is positively associated with first marriage formation—a move
away from traditional marriage where men's, but not women's, economic
status was important in the marriage market. However, empirical work
focusing on the claim that first marriage and remarriage formation are
similar is lacking. In this paper I analyze the individual
characteristics associated with the likelihood of both first marriage
and remarriage by gender. The results show that education, income, and
employment status have positive effects on first marriage for both men
and women, regardless of future divorce status. However, in remarriage,
the characteristics associated with union formation are different.
Instead, the patterns are consistent with traditional marriages where
economic status has a positive effect on remarriage for men, but not for
women. For women, family background, race/ethnicity, age and parental
status are associated with remarriage. My findings raise questions
about how gender dynamics in remarriage differ from those in first
marriage and if higher order marriages are unique from first marriages.
Tuesday, March 16, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Lisa Perry, Department of Heritage Studies
Title: Wheelwright, Kentucky: Building an Appalachian Camelot
Abstract: In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,
national demand for natural resources, particularly coal necessary for
steel production, made it economically viable for expansion of rail
lines into Central Appalachia. This previously sparsely populated region
experienced rapid growth as coal companies began constructing towns to
support the mining industry. These captive towns were solely owned by
the coal companies - the homes, stores, mines, hospitals, and often the
churches and schools. The quality of these towns varied widely, as did
the care companies invested in worker quality of life. These
paternalistic practices were integral to the development of community
identity. In one of these towns, Wheelwright, Kentucky, former residents
recall the period when the town was owned by Inland Steel Company as a
time of Camelot. This is particularly true of those who grew up there in
period from 1945 to 1960. The study, completed over a period of nearly
three years, seeks to analyze how the shared community identity came
about (and continues to be shared through annual reunions) and to
investigate the limits of this shared identity. One of the key findings
of the study is that this identification of Camelot seems to be limited
to whites, particularly whites who were children, adolescents, and young
adults during these years. Although the community was racially and
ethnically diverse, non-white residents, while remembering the time with
nostalgia, are more tempered in their praise.
Tuesday, March 30, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Dr. Veena Kulkarni, Department of Criminology,
Sociology, and Geography
Title: Wives’ Earning Contribution: The Case of Asian Households in the
United States
Abstract: One of the notable features of the family lives of
Americans in the recent decades is the steady rise of paid labor force
participation by married women. The specific nature of this overall
trend has been documented to vary by measurable characteristics such as
socioeconomic circumstances but by less measurable ones like gender
ideology. Further, the interaction between the above sets of
characteristics has been seen to systematically differ by race/ethnicity
and immigration statuses. The existing literature on race-ethnic
differentials in economic outcomes of married women tends to be limited
to Black-White-Hispanic comparisons. The present study using the 2000
Census data examines wives’ earning contribution in married couple
households for six major Asian groups disaggregated by their immigration
status. The results show the significance of human capital and
immigration specific factors. Wives from groups with husband’s high
human capital of their husbands are less likely to make earnings
contribution to household income than those whose husbands have lower
earning ability. However, for groups such as the Filipinos, the higher
earnings contribution even after controlling for the husband’s human
capital are suggestive of the role of factors like the historical
context of Filipino migration to the U.S. or the occupational niche of
Filipinas in the health care industry. Further, there are significant
differences between the foreign and the native born. The wives in
foreign born households relative to their native born counterparts are
more likely to work when the husbands’ human capital is low. Overall,
the findings indicate that the dichotomous frameworks of
‘gender-specialization’ (bread winner- homemaker) versus ‘economic
independence’ may not always be able to fully capture the heterogeneity
in the patterns of Asian wives’ economic contribution in the United
States.
Tuesday, April 6, 4-5 p.m., Wilson 217C (the Konold Room)
Speaker: Dr. Michael Botts, Department of Criminology,
Sociology, and Geography
Title: Internment in the U.S.A.: Review of Past Internment Practices
and Future Possibilities
Abstract: The U.S. has had a diverse use of internment.
Beginning with the Native Americans, the U.S. has utilized the
internment of groups of peoples, ostensibly for the security of the
nation. Utilization of internment for national security creates a
structural contradiction (Chambliss) in which the overt values of
political freedom and national security oftentimes conceal a maintenance
of the status quo or the advancement of a power elite (Mills). Various
past implementations and plans for internment are explored. In
addition, present political climate and future possibilities are
examined. Pertinent international and domestic law is reviewed.
# # #
|